Blog Home |  Email Author  |        Welcome to Community Server Sign in | Join

Fighting Liberal Lies!


Obama and our ticket to hell!

By Jim Hayett
Wednesday, Apr 8 2009, 04:08 PM

Here's a sad but true story exposing Obama and the democrats' corruption with regard to their lies while running for office and their total disregard to the fact that Americans do not want to socialize our country. Oh, and a little more bias media. Know why? I have not seen any of this news on msm TV or in print.

Over the weekend, Fox News reporter Andrew Napolitano found some banks that not only didn't want the TARP money (and yes, some from 2008 under Bush), they are begging to give it back. One bank CEO said he will write the check and with interest. So why do some banks not want TARP? Simple. Obama and the democrats now want to control the banks lock stock and barrel.

These bank CEO's are getting a feeling of socialism towards their banks and their employees. None of them want to be run by the government. And can you blame them? How can any honest and decent law abiding American argue this point? But unless you drink too much Obama Kool Aid, than I guess you wouldn't understand any of this. Watching Obama fire GM's CEO last month but not terminating those truly responsible for the long term collapse of GM, Ron Gettlefinger, President if the UAW union for starters, would scare the daylight out of any bank CEO. Of course, Obama and his democrats can't even think of firing the union boss. Our unions gave $63 million to Obama and the democrats for their untruthful campaigns last November

But what does the Obama regime say to this pay back with interest? NO!! Are you still following the bouncing ball? Obama and the dems want to control all our banks and be able to hire and fire all bank employees and create their own government board of directors.

Is anyone out there awake? Obama, along with Pelosi and Reid who control him with puppet strings, are creating not only a bankrupt USA, but socializing us into hell. That's what many European leaders are telling Obama. This is your ticket to hell if you socialize.

Comments

jmark   

Jim, You're sounding a little hysterical. Chill out dude.

April 8, 2009 8:28 AM

BillyJ   

Mr. H,

Will anyone expose Matt Pickard for being caught with not only lying about what people said, but changing bloggers comments so they hurt the person who wrote them? How does this paper/blog site allow dishonest people like this village idiot, MC, to even stay here? As one who has seen my fair share of people leave because of the idiot Pickard twins, I would ask the living lake organization to  kick him off for lying and breaking your rules. Do you guys even have rules or is this paper another dishonest msm liberal machine and only enforces rules to those that are not liberal.

April 8, 2009 9:04 AM

Victor Ponelis   

JIM:  Why should I take you seriously?  Do you THINK before you type?  You throw accusations at Obama, but why should I believe anything you say, when, over in my blog, you claim Muslims harmed the Ottomans and Huns....when the Ottomans WERE Muslim and the Huns were long gone from Europe by then?  That's like saying the Nazis fought Genghis Khan.  

You have ZERO credibility.  I've heard you're a good father, and decent small business person.  Please stick to that, or at least THINK before you write.  You are looking like a fool...and I mean that in the nicest way possible.

April 8, 2009 9:47 AM

Dustin Klein   

Until I receive proof from your diatribe, I have a hard time believing what you are saying. Banks were crying for the money in 2008. TARP hasn't even been expanded in 2009 under Obama. Unfortunately for you, banks who didn't want the money, didn't receive the money.

If you can cite your example then I'll be a little more lax to your idea. As for now, your credibility in this post is next to null.

April 8, 2009 11:33 AM

Jim Hayett   

Victor…loss of credibility is where I ask you direct questions, like I have so many times, that shows what lies come from Obama, democrats, and the liberal hypocrites here in general, but you and others refuse to debate and then all run for cover. That’s losing credibility!! You and others complained about Bush and his spending over 8 years but Obama comes in and doubles to triples that deficit in 8 weeks and you are silent. That's losing credibility. And what is even worse about this loss of credibility? You quoted me wrong AGAIN! My comments about the Ottomans were towards Muslims that followed Islam! Not the entire Muslim nation. Here’s what I said (unless you are like MC and changed my comment? I hope not Victor). “If you have the time to study all the way back to the Ottomans and the Huns, they all tried to work with the Muslims and Islam” The HUNS VICTOR!!!

And read your first sentence and jmarks. Neither of you AGAIN can defend these serious lies and corruption from Obama and the democrats you voted for. Just attack me!!

As they brainwash you and jmark into voting for them, they hand you Kool Aid and you then stand here and ignore all what Obama is doing to destroy our county. That’s losing all credibility by anyone’s book! And you still don’t debate the truth or the facts about this blog post. You wife got a chuckle? My wife and even my youngest child get a real chuckle when you and so many others run for cover when Amy and I show you the path to hell that Obama is taking you and I on. Wake up Victor. You seem much smarter than that!! Please don’t make me out you in the village idiot group.

April 8, 2009 11:42 AM

Victor Ponelis   

Why do you criticize the president?  Criticizing the president is criticizing America....why do you hate America?

When Bu$h was president, any criticism of him was greeted with such scorn.  You are a hypocrite.

Your Ottoman/Hun comment still makes as much sense as it did before.  There's this thing, called history....check it out sometime.  You'd be surprised at what you can learn...

April 8, 2009 12:09 PM

Jim Hayett   

Dustin…as I said on your blog, you obviously have no balanced news sources. This is why few take you seriously. Go and watch FOX or a daily business channel like CNBC. Obama refusing to take back TARP money, and Geithner refused to accept checks from these banks, are all over balanced and honest news outlets.  That last two URL’s show where Obama and Geithner refuse to take back funds. The other banks names will be out soon.  

findarticles.com/.../ai_n31453593

online.wsj.com/.../SB123879833094588163.html

money.cnn.com/.../index.htm

www.bloomberg.com/.../news

americaswatchtower.com/.../obama-refuses-repayment-of-tarp-money-in-order-to-keep-control-of-banks

www.politico.com/.../20871_Page2.html

April 8, 2009 12:18 PM

David Otto   

Jim, for arguments sake, I'll take your word that CEOs of some banks want to return TARP funds in fear of govenment controll. Ok, I problably would be terrified for my job too,  I just over saw the loss of billions upon billions of dollars down the tubes, I refuse to take any honerable action like refusing undeserved bonuses or resigning and now the government might force accountability on me, yea I'd be scared and rightfully so. I don't deserve any thing else. To the GM problem it's not the Unions Fault upper management failed miseably, they killed a working electric car, promoted huge gas guzzelers and made unattractive autos. The thing that angers me the most about Ford, and GM is they both make stellar cars and trucks that are attractive, safe, fuel effecent and inexpensive. The catch, none of those models are available in North America, that is not the unions fault. You and other business tyrants hate organized labour because we don't allow you to take advantage of labour and hoard the wealth to your self. Be honest you just hate unions.

April 8, 2009 12:20 PM

Jim Hayett   

Victor…I do read history and much about the world of Islam. The Ottomans were fed up with the violence and corruption amongst other Muslims that followed Islam in a violent nature. The Huns too came close to destroying the Muslim world. History is history. Or, do liberals have two sides to that too? Enough of this on this blog post. I will take this up elsewhere with you, but I want all to stick to this post.

Any chance you can try to address my facts and ask why does Obama not want to take back any TARP funds?

April 8, 2009 12:25 PM

Victor Ponelis   

Fine.  I will address your post.

I agree the American people do not want socialism.  As far as I can tell, neither does Obama.  You claim he's a socialist....cite references, please.

I do not believe Obama wants to control the banks...but he wants better regulation.

Personally, I think that Obama should listen to Paul Krugman, nationalize the banks, clean them up resell them to the private sector.  I think Treasury is captive of Wall Street.

Remember, unfettered capitalism is BAD.  Laws and regulations are needed for things to work well.  The reason we're in this mess is that Republicans, with some Democratic help, deregulated Wall Street.

Don't you, as a parent, want your children to be independent, yet still give them rules within which to operate?  

April 8, 2009 12:26 PM

jmark   

Jim: I read the article from Bloomberg. There's no mention of Obama refusing to take back funds. It does however state that the "Treasury hasn’t taken a public stand on whether it’s good or bad for banks to return the funds, and is setting up a process for repayments".

April 8, 2009 12:59 PM

Victor Ponelis   

OK, one last time....WHEN did the Huns threaten Muslims?

Here's the wikipedia entry: en.wikipedia.org/.../Huns

I feel like I'm in some Bizarro, parallel world....help...

April 8, 2009 1:20 PM

Jim Hayett   

Victor…you asked why I criticize the president and doing so is hating America. I don’t see that criticizing our president is hating America. I made a point similar to this, if this is what you are referring to, where lying about our president just to get your candidate in office is a person who is anti-American.  Keyword is lies, not criticize!

I have proven time and time again to those like Blackwell, MC, Jake and yes even you Victor, that much of your hate or dislike for Bush was unfounded and much from the liberal lies that permeate our msm. From the war on terror to Bush spending vs. Obama’s, I have shown the facts and I took much of my data from democrats you and all the others voted for as my source. And nearly every time I did this, not one liberal went after my facts (except Reff33 but as much as I like him, he did fail) that prove that these lies towards Bush were a bunch of lies that started from our MSM or some of our politicians. All my proof, videos, and data are out there in this website jungle if you care to go back and search.

So, why do I criticize Obama? Because the liberal MSM (still at 86%) will not give us Americans the truth about Obama’s agenda and they will never, never show you when he lies. That’s my job. But the difference between me, jmark, Blackwell and most other liberals here is that I’m not lying about Obama like so many liberals did to the Bush family. I’m showing you the truth and it obviously is hurting those that voted for him. Obama is too inexperienced and too much a liar to be our president. And you all know what lies he has committed because they are so outrageous and so obvious.

April 8, 2009 2:11 PM

Jim Hayett   

Jmark…here is an excerpt from the discussion with many bank CEO’s who wanted to pay back TARP and Obama’s comment and reaction.  It’s still in the URL’s I posted above.

“JPMorgan’s Dimon spoke first. He began by complimenting the president on the economic team he’d assembled. And he said his industry needs to explain more directly to the American people that the economic recovery plans are already working. Dimon also insisted that he’d like to give the government’s TARP money back as soon as practical, and asked the president to “streamline” that process.

But Obama didn’t like that idea — arguing that the system still needs government capital.

The president offered an analogy: “This is like a patient who’s on antibiotics,” he said. “Maybe the patient starts feeling better after a couple of days, but you don’t stop taking the medicine until you’ve finished the bottle.” Returning the money too early, the president argued could send a bad signal.

Several CEOs disagreed, arguing instead that returning TARP money was their patriotic duty, that they didn’t need it anymore, and that publicity surrounding the return would send a positive signal of confidence to the markets. “

April 8, 2009 2:14 PM

Jim Hayett   

Victor…I’m publishing your comment because I owe you an apology. It was not the Huns who nearly wiped out Islam, it was the Mongols. When I wrote my comment, I used the wrong ethnic group. The Mongols nearly destroyed the Muslims and Islam. However, the Ottomans came very close and the O’s are not all Muslims. They had many Jews in their armies and cities, and even had laws to protect them. The O’s went on and attacked kingdom after kingdom and didn't take lightly those in Islam that were not true followers. Many Muslims tried to retaliate against the O’s but they kept fighting back.

The Huns did attack Muslims I think as early as the year 400-500

April 8, 2009 2:38 PM

Jim Hayett   

By the way libs, here's today's latest Gallup poll about those that are satisfied.

In the last week, an average of 26% of Americans said they were satisfied with the way things were going in the United States.

April 8, 2009 2:46 PM

Jim Hayett   

Bill...sorry, I forgot about you. Yes, that's what we heard about Matt and his lies and his own literary theft. He tries to accuse others when he is caught. He is the ultimate hypocrite. Notice so many of these lies and attacks come from liberals.

April 8, 2009 2:50 PM

Jim Hayett   

David…you don’t have to take my word on the banks giving back TARP. I posted the URL’s just above and in great detail too.

I disagree with you on who is responsible for GM’s failure. Yes, it is about time Detroit woke up. But it should never come from a sitting President firing a CEO from a publicly traded company and then not fire the union head that helped keep the company from being profitable. The UAW union is equally, probably more, involved with the auto failure than you want to think or admit. And don’t even try to get a word of this from your local papers or the MSM. They endorsed Obama and all unions. This is why you hear me get so worked up when I see so many smart people right here commenting daily but have no clue what is happening in the real world. I force myself to watch CBS, NBC, CNN, etc. so I can get balanced news. My kids also watch FOX news during dinner hour so they get balanced political news which is missing in our public schools. I also read many liberal books. EVEN Michael Moore’s!!  You should do the same.

April 8, 2009 3:21 PM

David Otto   

I think Gould be surprised who I watch and listen to and read. I will name a few mostly due to space Bill O'riely, his books I don't get cable, yes I've read Moore, listen to Glenn Beck, I get Keith Olbermans pod cast, NPR, WPR, BBC, Al Jazera world, Ny Times, Gaurdian Unlimited, lexis Nexis...

April 8, 2009 3:41 PM

Jim Hayett   

David…do you use the free version of LexisNexis or do you pay for it? Get cable. It's where the only balanced news is located.

April 8, 2009 3:55 PM

David Otto   

I usually use a friends account, or latley have them pull info for me, I used to have a subscription with some one else but due to my budget and income cut I had to take it's a cost I can afford not to have. Ditto for cable, to many crappy channels to justify the cost especially when I get so many free channels over the air.

April 8, 2009 4:04 PM

Victor Ponelis   

JIM:  I appreciate the apology re oversight....Mongols...yes, Tamerlane was especially vicious.

But remember, Islam did not exist before the early 600s....so they could NEVER have encountered Huns, or, at least the Huns of the Attila variety.

And I still think you're paranoid re Obama, he's much more disappointingly centrist than us lefties like!

April 8, 2009 4:44 PM

Jacob Pickard   

Jimmy - What liberal and democratic positions due you support since you are a centrist?

April 8, 2009 8:13 PM

Jim Hayett   

Victor...you are too funny.

April 8, 2009 9:24 PM

Jim Hayett   

Hi Jacob...first, this is not the point of my blog. Second, I chased you all over these blogs trying to get you to answer some tough and some easy questions about Bush, Iraq and so on. You avoided them every time. But I'll give you the benefit of the doubt, and say most every time. Knowing all this, why should I answer your questions? Because I'm an honest Christian who does make mistakes daily.

Energy, Iraq, better regulations of banks and or the mortgage industry but zero ownership by our government, hope Obama is as good with our national forests and right to hunt that Bush was, freedom of religion. Hope that’s that good for starters.

Care to ask me what it is that I don’t like about liberalism? What do I get in return Jacob? More attacks or vicious blogs that will be written about me or my wife?

April 8, 2009 9:36 PM

Carl Hicks   

 It is not the  demos or repubs that need the banks to take this money so they have controlover the  banks it is the FED but we as good little pawns blame the puppets.... Faux news? fair and balanced?  HUH? They are about as "fair and balanced" as MSNBC ( well ok those two would  balance out from opposing ends of a scale, just too bad they would not cancel each other out and  make room for some real news) . Hhhmmmm  the auto industry  , my guess there would be as someone said above  there are great cars being built  by Ford and GM just a shame they don't sell them in America , Ford  has a diesel  that gets about 70mpg(and no not a hybred) but they say " we don't think it would be  popular in the US...when what they probably meant was  (these cars aren't as profitable as big SUVs...)

April 8, 2009 11:41 PM

Jacob Pickard   

Funny Jim - I never wrote any blogs about you or your wife. And you still lack eveidence to back up your accusations of guilt. Answer you questions? All your questions are asked with teh suppositions that ALL LIBERALS LIE!!!!!!! None of your questions are ever fair in the first place or balanced. All you want is more ammunition to use for your war against liberals.

BillyJ - I agree, what Matt did was wrong by using the google grable thing. It didn't change the content however it just made you sound regular grabage that is spewed daily. As far as cheating and lying I guess you'll have to prove that. Makes me think you know more than you are saying.

And this, "And no, I don’t want to meet you because I don’t believe in torture or violence. You might get hurt." You just made a physical threat against me. I hope you thought about that before you wrote it.

April 9, 2009 6:37 AM

Jim Hayett   

Jacob…No you did not write blogs about me or my wife. That’s because you were hiding behind the fake name liberahammer. When you were LH you made very disgraceful comments about my wife and I that were absolutely not true and hurt her and my children. None of you liberals could get to me so you decide to drag in my wife. This is why I left liberalism and why few if any trust you or your brother. But I forgive and move on. Unfortunately with this situation, God gave me a memory and forgetting is most difficult.

Do you care to tackle my blog post other than attacking me? The message Jacob???? I would like to have dialogue with you again if you wish. But that’s your call and you know what I’m talking about.

Billy sent me an email and asked if he could post his comments you requested from your blog on my blog post. Know why? Molly and Billy do not trust either of you and that trust was totally lost when your brother was caught cheating and editing comments from bloggers to fit his agenda. That’s lying, stealing, and cheating. Why does that not matter or get an apology from an atheist? Since the LCR doesn’t seem to care about what Matt does, how can you have bloggers want to even stay here. It looks like rules are NOT for liberals. If Amy or I had cheated and lied like Matt did, I assure you we would have been in front of the Milw JS editorial board. You do know what happened to the extremely liberal NY Times, US News and World Report, ABC, Dan Rather, and Marilyn Mapes. They all lost jobs and careers due to their liberal lying. These hateful liberals were caught doing the same thing Matt Pickard did. This is why some want him removed since he broke the rules and one of the biggest: changing a bloggers words in a comment so to make him look good and the blogger bad. Who does he answer to when he breaks the rules?

There are no opinions here (except the JS board), just facts. Let’s stick to the facts.

April 9, 2009 7:58 AM

Jim Hayett   

Carl...if you watched FOX news you wouldn't make those comments. How does O'Reilly get to be the top cable news show for 100 straight months? No other msm outlet can make the claim of fair and balanced. All the shows on FOX, including the liberal ones as well, have all political sides reporting and many in equal amounts. Rarely see that on CNN or MSNBC. And we both know that’s NEVER on the big three.

Why do liberals ignore the major reason behind making these autos  profitable (labor costs)? The UAW!! Notice nothing is mentioned about how the union’s involvement is destroying GM. That's because the MSM endorses the unions and the unions gave $63 million to the democrats. I’ll let you do the math on this one.

April 9, 2009 8:09 AM

mpicard   

@you wing-nut blockheads: Unlike Jim who can not reverse plagiarism once it is done and once he has been busted for it, produce a 3 year study when requested, cite examples of "centrism," or make-up for poor parenting via internet monitoring - I can easily, quite easily, reverse anyone's changed comments on my blog.

But I won't. Since Hemmer went and tattletaled like the school yard bully she is, I can no longer my favorite form of ridicule. Your snide, factually incorrect comments are better off my blog anyway. You do me no favors by commenting. In fact, by not commenting you help me out a great deal.

I now return back to your regularly schedule menu of threats, delusions, and likewise lies and attacks.

Being on this board is nauseating enough.

April 9, 2009 8:28 AM

Jim Hayett   

Matt…I don plagiarize and I don’t lie and steal words from others and then change them  like you were just caught doing here at the LLC blog site. You accuse me of coping someone’s article but if I do, I give credit. Can I make an honest mistake? Have I forgotten to add the name or the magazine or paper? I’m sure I have. I apologize when I do.  I make mistake because I’m a Christian. You deliberately lie, steal bloggers words from comments, and viciously attack bloggers and their family. All to try and cover up what you do. If these were honest mistakes, and just a few, no one would have lost their trust for you. But these are deliberate issues only to harm those that don’t agree with your politics and atheism. You know I’m 100% accurate. But you will continue to make a fool of yourself by kicking and screaming while trying to deny all this. You bring it up,  I will continue to make sure all the readers know the truth. Stop your childish antics and I will move on.

April 9, 2009 9:09 AM

Jim Hayett   

Matt...have you ever tried to once admit you are wrong and try to apologize with SINCERE emotions and words? It goes a long way with winning friends and influencing people

April 9, 2009 9:15 AM

mpicard   

@Jim: You would be correct in your observations if I said I never changed the form of peoples words. But I own it. I don't deny it. I explain my reasons why. It is for ridicule sake, because really, you deserve some response, but not a reasoned, well argued response. When I try that Jim I get called a liar and hypocrite anyway. So, it's rather useless for me to try.

I always attribute my work. Even when I've taken your words and turned them into a post of mine to ridicule you, I have hyperlinked to your post so that my readers would understand the context. So yes Jim, I ridicule. So your accusations, once again are baseless. Like your accusations of me as the hacker. You had proof remember? Proof that spurious and non-existant to say the least. And sorry, Jim, again, I never attacked your family. I have attacked you plenty of times. You are well within your bounds to call me out on that. Fair enough. Since you again make the accusations, do you mind quoting me, the post, the date and time, and where I attacked your family. I keep asking for proof. Where is it?

You say you make honest mistakes. Well, Jim, we are human. If you say it's honest, fine. But your cut/paste jobs have happened more than once, and it is continually happens after you've been called on it. Didn't you tell me once that before sending a letter to someone, you put it in a drawer overnight and wait on it? I would think that someone so premeditated in their actions would be so likewise on these blogs if they are posting work that is represented as their own. I'm foul-mouthed. Everyone knows it. At least they are my words and not someone else. Oh btw, I never denied that I am foul mouth either - if I did, well, I'd be lying Jim.

So no Jim, I don't cover up. Baseless accusation again.

You see, I own everything I do. I treat people the way the treat me. As a Christian you should understand "eye for an eye."

As a caveat, when a right-winger such as yourself begins a post that someone is "liar" or "hypocrite" or an "anti-american" in the context of referring to me or the specific person they are commenting on etc... its a personal attack. American Citizen has been posting on my blog. I warned AC about his personal attacks. AC has throttled back since then.

If you want to continue this conversation, you can email me. Perhaps I'll even read it - or perhaps I'll change the form of your words and post it on my blog.

April 9, 2009 9:37 AM

mpicard   

@Jim: I said I was done with it and email then I read the above question. Yes, I once apologized to you Jim for sending, at the time, only one "f" word. I have apologized to Amy for saying she attacked my deceased grandma. I agree with conservatives when I am wrong or if I have not been clear enough. Plenty of evidence on my blog at that - and recently too. And yes, I will attack back if I am attacked. I'm human. I get angry. duh. I'm not Spock.

Seriously, Jim, I am not worried about "winning" friends. Of those I have plenty as I have plenty of readers on my blog. I have extensive metrics and can even tell when someone posts from their office or home.

Again, email me about any other observations you have. Perhaps you won't be annoying to the point I have to tell you to "f" to desist.

April 9, 2009 9:57 AM

Jim Hayett   

Matt...I would love to have dialogue and trust with you and Jacob like my wife and I had for you earlier on. You chose to destroy that trust. You can get it back so we can all blog and comment together. The choice was and still is yours and yours alone.

Where am I posting this comment from? Work or home??

April 9, 2009 11:10 AM

jmark   

Jim,  If you're going to accuse someone of attacking your family you need to offer some evidence to support your claim. Otherwise you're just making a lot of noise.  

April 9, 2009 11:50 AM

mpicard   

Btw... I've restored BillyJ''s one altered-form comment and two of Hemmer's to its original petulance.  There is no aol translation done. Like I said, they could be restored and easily enough. I'll leave you to debate the ethics over it. I think I made my point. Personal attacks and snide comments will be ridiculed. The posts that are altered as a subject of my post will stand. You were not directly quoted.

community.livinglakecountry.com/.../meet-the-new-blockhead-f-amp-bfox.aspx

community.livinglakecountry.com/.../default.aspx

That is all.  

April 9, 2009 2:08 PM

Jim Hayett   

sirlaughsalot....you should be very quite on this. You posted comments last year and you know all about it. Case closed.  BTW, what gives us the pleasure of your visit to Hartland?

April 9, 2009 3:19 PM

mpicard   

Here are the links of Jims' plagiarized posts.

Most recent example:

community.livinglakecountry.com/.../vote-on-april-7-2009.aspx

From Jan, 23:

community.livinglakecountry.com/.../study-reveals-more-bias-in-our-mainstream-media.aspx

From June 28th. Orginally discovered by Jmark

community.livinglakecountry.com/.../great-questions.aspx

I wrote Jim to ask him about it on the June 29th. "Hope your enjoying this lovely Sunday. Hey, I wanted to give you a heads-up. One of the readers of the LCL blogs has written me and wondering about possible plagiarism with the "Great Questions" post. (Saturday, Jun 28 2008, 10:12 AM)  I do not think this is the case. If you follow Shoe Guys link to Comedy Central page, there is a posting by john who lifts your LCL post word for word. (Jun 27, 2008 10:27:56 PM) If the times are correct, GMT Central time, then the CC is posted by 25 mins. later. Anyway, you should be aware of it."

There's at least one other and I don't recall which post is was without a little more research.

(Cross posted from Victors blog.)

April 9, 2009 4:00 PM

jmark   

sirjimbo, As usual, you have no evidence to support your ridiculous accusations against MC.

Yes, if I remember correctly you insisted that I apologize to you. I  refused to lower myself to your pathetic level. You then somehow manged to have me banished ( I could no longer log in).  Why don't you publish my remark so others can judge?

April 9, 2009 5:09 PM

Carl Hicks   

Uh no Jim. Ford is not building these highly fuel efficient cars because they are diesel and  they say that diesel cars  are not well recieved in America. plain and simple. I had read this from a BBC news item last summer. Bill O'Rielly is popular for the same reasons Rush  is popular... sensationalistic journalism. You have to  just love it (that was sarcasm) when someone disagrees and  these two just shut them out  without  trying to give them a chance to finish what they are trying to say. Spin is not reporting, it's propaganda.

April 9, 2009 7:13 PM

Jim Hayett   

jmark and MC...take your bs, liberal lies and hate elsewhere. Nothing what you say is about this blog post. And jamrk? Everyone here, along with MC, knows what he did to me and my wife and daughter. They all read and heard what MC did. No one has to prove anything to you. MC will continue to try and change the pattern of thought so no one see who he really is.

Stick to the blog post and prove me wrong. Matt is a downright liar jmark, so are you and I have proven this many times.

Now, want to prove MC is a liar for the 100th time? He tries to convince idiots like you, jmark, that he only once called me a fuc&#r. I have so many emails and comments from MC, that I never posted, but still saved and sent to the LCR where Matt calls us the worse vile names I have ever head. You’re an idiot jmark who cannot and never will think for yourself. Neither one of you can or will ever know what honesty is nor can you debate someone without attacking the person who presents the facts. This is so much why I left liberalism. I was lead down the Kool Aid line just like you two idiots. God thank you for letting me realize how wrong I was.

Matt Pickard was caught lying again and changing people’s words from their comments. That is wrong in every way. He knows this as does the rest of the group. But he’s too much a little boy to ever admit, apologize, and make sure he doesn’t do this again. At least not purposely. But how does one rewrite history by accident? Ha Matt?

April 9, 2009 8:29 PM

mpicard   

Well Jim this thread was originally hijacked by BillyJ's post.

Also, where for the millionth time did I attack your daughter and your wife? The exact words, the exact time and date of the event. Evidence buddy. Evidence.

Also, you should know that I am re-posting this on my blog. So everyone can see what you will not allow.

You accuse me of playing games with comments - what about your own?

Oh never mind. If jim does it, it is okay.

April 9, 2009 9:56 PM

Jim Hayett   

MC...I will bury you with your own lies if you wish to keep this up. Drop it and it will all go away. here's just a tidbit that you sent me.

"YOU ARE A BAD PARENT BECAUSE YOUR WIFE AND YOUR FAMILY WAS AN EXPOSED TO A "F" WORD."

Or this one: "YOU ARE GUILTY OF BAD PARENTING."

April 9, 2009 11:48 PM

mpicard   

@Jim: Bury me? Ha ha. Jim, yes, you are a bad parent because you allowed your wife and your family to read my very first "f" word email to you. I don't control your computer or internet access and anyway why should I? Your emails are both your personal email address. You'll noticed that both of my above statements are addressed to YOU Jim. They are not addressed to your wife. It is you who allowed your wife and your family to read your emails. It is you, therefore, that are guilty of bad parenting.

All your crying about it, of gods knows why, is because you that think I should, what...be responsible for how you control your internet access and who can see what online. Please.

(oh so you know, I know have taken the habit of reposting every one of post because you only allow some to be posted. You play your own games with comments.)

April 10, 2009 4:04 AM

referee33   

OK! Flag thrown! "T" given! I'm  tired of having to clean the mud off of my keyboard before I can type.  I enjoy debating ISSUES with the both of you but I'm so sick of this personal war gone public, I could just spit! You guys want to attack each other, fine, just do it where we don't have to be a part of it. I have no idea what rules have been put in place by the LLC moderator, but I can't believe they allow these kinds of personal attacks. LLC moderator, are you doing your job?

April 10, 2009 9:35 AM

Jim Hayett   

Ref... I have. This is my first and only blog against these unwarranted and vicious attacks from this person. Just how long would you take this? Matt is the one who can't let go and is the one found guilty of what he accuses me? Our LLC caught him changing our comments. This doesn’t bother you?

Do you know he has incited all this hate for my wife and I and all from his lies? How many blogs has he published about me just to hide his guilt? How long can one go on without some sort of truth being allowed? That's why I said this is my first and only blog that will defend myself against this man’s lies about me and my wife. I can't stop Matt from his attacks, so if you too are sick of all this, what should you do?. Don't read them anymore

April 10, 2009 10:03 AM

Leave a Comment

Please Sign In to post comment.

About Jim Hayett

I live in Merton and have been married since 1989. We have two young girls. We enjoy going to church together, eating together, and vacationing together. My political goal is to educate people when it comes to politics. As a liberal who changed to a centrist, I believe America is ignorant when it comes to voting and politics.

Posts

Your browser must support javascript to use the posts pager. Please enable javascript or return to the home page to page through posts.
Newer Older

Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

Search the Blogs