Blog Home |  About this Blog       Welcome to Community Server Sign in | Join
Browse By tag All Tags » election 2008 (RSS)

Related Tags

A New Day

By Sally Pla
Wednesday, Nov 5 2008, 07:33 AM

According to news reports this morning, Senator McCain called Barack Obama at 10 p.m. to offer his congratulations on being elected the 44th president of the United States of America.

In the call, Mr. Obama said he was eager to sit down and talk with Mr. McCain; in his concession speech, Mr. McCain said he was ready to help Mr. Obama work through difficult times.

“I need your help,” Mr. Obama told McCain, according to an Obama adviser, Robert Gibbs. “You’re a leader on so many important issues.”

Mr. Bush called Mr. Obama shortly after 10 p.m. to congratulate him on his victory. “I promise to make this a smooth transition,” the president said to Mr. Obama, according to a transcript provided by the White House .“You are about to go on one of the great journeys of life. Congratulations, and go enjoy yourself.”

But Barack Obama didn't seem to be in a "go-enjoy-yourself" mood -- he left that to the crowds at Grant Park. He seemed moved, fully aware of the weightiness of the undertaking. He showed no illusion about how tough the road ahead will be. And in a way that touched my heart, he reached out with quiet grace.  

“To those Americans whose support I have yet to earn,” said President-Elect Obama, “I may not have won your vote, but I hear your voices, I need your help, and I will be your president, too.”

I pray we all will join together now and work hard for a better country. This election, and this nation, is about WE the people. Here's to unity, support, and resolving our differences in civilized fashion toward a common goal -- a stronger, better America. I have always felt that diversity of ideas -- all voices at the table --  leads to better decision-making. As of today, I feel that we finally are on our way toward that better decision-making.   

What a wonderful country we have, and what historic day this is. Americans are truly blessed.  


 

All Over but the Votin'

By Sally Pla
Tuesday, Nov 4 2008, 07:18 AM

Eleanor Roosevelt said that the only way to grow as a person was to do something new that scares you a little every day.  This election has scared -- and empowered me. I've pushed myself to get out there. I've dared to write about my thoughts in this blog. I've volunteered to campaign for a candidate -- Barack Obama -- for the first time ever in an election process. And as a result , I've met wonderful new friends who share a lot of my beliefs and ideals in what it will take to make this a better world. I've also renewed and reaffirmed friendship with others who don't share my views, but still have my utmost respect. I hope I have theirs as well.

In a lot of ways, this election is about being fearful versus being hopeful.

I am choosing to be hopeful.

Whoever wins today, I hope we can rally as a country round our new leader with unity of support. And with a loud, clear, confident, opinionated (but respectful)  voice. Becuase if this election has taught me anything, it's that the voice of the people matters. We must be heard. Or else it's not democracy.

Best way to do that today?

Please, vote.  

  


 

McCain can't use a computer?

By Sally Pla
Monday, Nov 3 2008, 07:45 AM

My cousin, who works for and with those with disabilities internationally, sent me this inspiring clip this morning. 

The vast proportion of agencies and initiatives for special needs in this country support Barack Obama for president.  (If Sarah Palin were voting only based on her child's welfare, she would reluctantly have to vote Obama too!)

Here's the track record, courtesy Independent Living USA: (http://www.ilusa.com/News/OBAMA-VS-MCCAIN.htm)

BARACK OBAMA VS. JOHN MCCAIN: Who Will Break Down the Barriers that Exclude People with Disabilities?  OBAMA ON SUPPORT FOR LIVING INDEPENDENTLY IN THE COMMUNITY Obama is a co-sponsor of the Community Choice Act of 2007.  Obama believes that individuals should be able to make their own choices for their livingarrangements and live independently in their communities.  [S.799, 110th Congress] Obama is a co-sponsor of the Community Living Assistance Services and Support (CLASS) Act Of 2007.  This bill would help individuals withfunctional impairments pay for services that they need to maximize their independence.  [S.1758, 110th Congress] MCCAIN ON SUPPORT FOR LIVING INDEPENDENTLY IN THE COMMUNITY McCain strongly opposes the Community Choice Act.  Asked about the Community Choice Act at a Town Hall in Denver, McCain said "The CommunityChoice Act is not a piece of legislation that I support." [McCain Town Hall, 7/7/08]  OBAMA ON EDUCATION FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES Barack Obama supports full funding of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), early intervention and developmental programs, andexpanded college opportunities for students with disabilities. Obama voted for over $44 billion in funding for the IDEA.  [SCR 21, Senate Vote #94, 3/22/07] Obama will invest $10 billion per year in early intervention, educational and developmental programs for children between zero and five.  His planwill help expand programs such as Early Head Start to serve more children with disabilities.  His plan also will encourage states to expand programsfor children with disabilities, such as IDEA Part C. [Obama Plan to Empower Americans with Disabilities] Obama supports increasing opportunities for college students with disabilities.  He also will provide more support for these college students.Obama was an original co-sponsor of the Senate bill to reauthorize the Higher Education Act (S. 1642) which significantly expands opportunities andsupports for individuals with disabilities to attend college and graduate programs.  [S.1642, 110th Congress]  MCCAIN ON EDUCATION FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES     John McCain has repeatedly voted against the IDEA even though he claims he supports full funding of it. McCain has repeatedly voted against funding for special education. > McCain repeatedly voted against funding increases for the IDEA. [H.R.4577, Senate Vote #170, 6/30/00; SCR 23, Senate Vote #103, 3/26/03] > McCain has chosen tax cuts for the wealthy over education funding for students with disabilities.  Specifically, McCain voted against increasing spending in the amount of $229 billion over 10 years for the IDEA.  McCainalso voted against an amendment that would create a reserve fund of $73 billion in IDEA funding.  The spending would have been made possible by reducing tax cuts.  [SCR 23, Senate Vote #103, 3/26/03; SCR 23, Senate Vote#70, 3/21/03] McCain did not co-sponsor reauthorization of the Higher Education Act (S.1642).  He also did not vote on passage of the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act in the 110th Congress. [S.1642, 110th Congress; S. 1642, Senate Vote #275, 7/24/07] OBAMA ON SOCIAL SERVICES SPENDING Obama opposes a freeze on social services spending for people with disabilities. Obama voted against capping non-defense spending which means that socialservice spending for people with disabilities could continue to meet their needs.  In 2005, Obama voted against the Inhofe amendment that would capnon-defense, non-trust fund spending. [S.1932, Senate Vote #286, 11/3/05] MCCAIN ON SOCIAL SERVICES SPENDING McCain promises that he will cap non-defense spending for at least one year, meaning that social services spending for people with disabilitieswill be capped as well. McCain voted in favor of capping non-defense spending. In 2005, McCain voted for the Inhofe amendment that would cap non-defense and non-trust fundspending. [S.1932, Senate Vote #286, 11/3/05] McCain proposed a freeze of discretionary spending as illustrated when he said, "As president, I will also order a prompt and thorough review of thebudgets of every federal program, department, and agency. While that top-to-bottom review is underway, we will institute a one-year pause indiscretionary spending increases with the necessary exemption of military spending and veterans' benefits." [McCain Remarks on the Economy at CarnegieMellon University, 4/15/08] OBAMA ON HEALTH CARE FOR AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES Obama will sign universal health care into law by the end of his first term in office, and he has supported expanding the State Children's HealthInsurance Program ("SCHIP") and health care programs for people with disabilities, children, and veterans. Under Obama's plan to provide universal health insurance, insurance companies will not be able to stop individuals from getting coverage even ifthey have pre-existing conditions and disabilities.  Obama's plan allows individuals and businesses to purchase public or private health coveragethrough a national health insurance exchange.  Obama's plan would make health care more affordable and accessible to all Americans, particularlyindividuals who have been denied coverage in the private market due to a pre-existing condition or disability. [Obama Plan to Empower Individualswith Disabilities] Obama is a co-sponsor of ending the Medicare Waiting Period Act of 2007 (S.2102).  Before they can get Medicare coverage, people with disabilitiesmust first receive Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) for 24 months.  Due to the 24-month Medicare waiting period, an estimated 400,000Americans with disabilities are uninsured and many more are underinsured at a time in their lives when they need health coverage the most.  During thiswaiting period, many individuals develop secondary conditions, their health status worsens and many die.  Obama supports legislation that would phaseout this harmful waiting period and provide individuals with health insurance. [S.2102, 110th Congress] Obama supported expanded health insurance for children. In 2007, Obama voted to reauthorize the SCHIP at over $60 billion for five years.  Twochildren who live with a single parent who makes $51,510 would have access to health insurance coverage under SCHIP.  The bill would provide $100million in new grants to fund state outreach and enrollment efforts and allocate $49 million for a demonstration project to streamline theenrollment process for low-income children already eligible for coverage. [HR 976, Senate Vote #307, 8/2/07] Obama supported assuring accessible health care to people with disabilities by co-sponsoring the Promoting Wellness for Individuals with DisabilitiesAct (S.1050) The bill would require the U.S. Access Board to establish access standards for all diagnostic equipment (examination tables, x-ray,mammography and other radiological equipment, etc.).  It also educates physicians and dentists by requiring that medical schools, dental schools,and their residency programs provide training to improve competency and clinical skills in providing care to patients with disabilities (includingthose with intellectual disabilities) as a condition of receiving federal funds.  Finally, it establishes a national wellness grant program which willauthorize funding for programs or activities for smoking cessation, weight control, nutrition or fitness that are tailored to the needs of individualswith disabilities and authorize funding for preventive health screening programs for individuals with disabilities to reduce the incidence ofsecondary conditions.  [S.1050, 110th Congress]  Obama supported expanding health care for veterans. > In 2005, Obama voted for providing an additional $500 million per year for the next five years for mental health services for veterans.  [S.2020,Senate Vote #343, 11/17/05]  > In 2006, Obama voted in favor of adding $430 million for outpatient and inpatient health care and treatment for veterans.  Nearly half of themilitary servicemen and women serving in Iraq and Afghanistan will require health care services for the physical and psychological traumas of war, yetthe Bush administration and Republican-led Congress have underfunded the Veterans Administration's medical services by at least $1.2 billion for 2007alone.  And, this was the second consecutive year they had done so. [H.R.4939, Senate Vote #98, 4/26/06; The Independent Budget, A Budget forVeterans by Veterans, 2/10/06; Newsweek, 1/19/06] Obama voted to grant access to Medicaid for Hurricane Katrina victims for up to five months.  The bill would have provided full federal funding forMedicaid in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama for up to one year and provided $800 million to help people who were caring for Katrina evacuees.[S.1932, Senate Vote #285, 11/3/05] Obama voted for $2 million for research of traumatic brain injuries to improve imaging for traumatic brain injury testing and adapting currenttechnologies to treat brain injuries suffered in war.  [H.R.5631, S. Amdt. 4781, Senate Vote #222, 8/2/06; CQ, 8/2/06] MCCAIN ON HEALTH CARE FOR AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES McCain's health care plan does not prohibit discrimination against individuals with pre-existing conditions and disabilities.  McCain'shealthcare plan would replace the existing tax exclusion for employer-sponsored health coverage with a refundable tax credit for allAmericans as an incentive to purchase health insurance.  However, many individuals with disabilities are denied coverage or unable to affordcoverage in the private market due to pre-existing conditions and disabilities.  While McCain's plan would work with states to develop bestpractice models in expanding coverage to individuals who have been denied coverage, it would not prohibit discrimination. [Washington Post, 4/30/08] McCain opposed reauthorizing SCHIP and providing insurance for millions of uninsured children.  According to Knight Ridder, "The [2007] Senate proposalwould provide coverage to 3.2 million" uninsured children and renew coverage for the 6 million children already covered by the program.  The legislation passed 68-31. [H.R. 976, Vote #307, 8/2/07; Knight Ridder, 8/2/07] McCain voted against $2 million of funding for research of traumatic brain injuries.  McCain rejected legislation that would help improve imaging fortraumatic brain injury testing and adapting current technologies to treat brain injuries suffered in war.  [H.R.5631, S. Amdt. 4781, Senate Vote #222,8/2/06; CQ, 8/2/06] McCain opposed expanding health care for veterans.  > In 2005, McCain voted against providing an additional $500 million per year for the next five years for mental health services for veterans.[S.2020, Senate Vote #343, 11/17/05] > In 2006, McCain was one of 13 senators who voted against adding $430 million for outpatient and inpatient health care and treatment for veterans.Amendment passed 84-16.  [H.R.4939, Vote #98, 4/26/06] McCain voted against granting access to Medicaid for Hurricane Katrina victims for up to five months.  The Bill would have provided full federalfunding for Medicaid in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama for up to one year and provided $800 million to help people who were caring for Katrinaevacuees.  [S.1932, Senate Vote #285, 11/3/05] McCain has not co-sponsored the Promoting Wellness for Individuals with Disabilities Act (S.1050) OBAMA ON CIVIL RIGHTS FOR AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES Obama strongly supports the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Restoration Act.  Indeed, he signed on as an original co-sponsor of theSenate version of the ADA Restoration Act.  [S.1050, 110th Congress] Obama will appoint judges who exhibit empathy for individuals withdisabilities.  "Barack  Obama will appoint judges and justices who respectCongress' role as a co-equal, democratically elected branch of government and who exhibit empathy with what it means to be an American with adisability" [Obama Plan To Empower Individuals With Disabilities]MCCAIN ON CIVIL RIGHTS FOR AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES While McCain has also co-sponsored the ADA Restoration Act, he has promised to appoint judges like those who interpreted the ADA narrowly and deprivedmillions of people with disabilities of their civil rights.  McCain said that as president, he would "appoint strict constructionist judges."  [AP,8/7/07]  "In an address at Wake Forest University, McCain pledged to nominate jurists who believe 'there are clear limits to the scope ofjudicial power'...By way of example, McCain said he would look for people in the cast of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Samuel A. AlitoJr., and his friend the late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. He called them 'jurists of the highest caliber who know their own minds, and know thelaw, and know the difference.'" [Los Angeles Times, 5/7/08] OBAMA ON MEDICARE ELIGIBILITY In 2007, Obama voted against increasing Medicare Part D premiums for beneficiaries making over $80,000 annually.   Obama voted against the EnsignAmendment that would require Medicare prescription drugs beneficiaries with annual incomes over $80,000 and couples with annual incomes over $160,000 topay a larger share of their Medicare Part D premium.[SCR 21, Senate Vote #93, 3/22/07] Obama opposed means testing for Medicare.  In response to a NCPSSM questionnaire, Obama said, "The bill added 'means testing' to Part B ofMedicare, requiring individuals with incomes over $80,000 to pay gradually higher premiums. This undermines the basic premise of Medicare as aninsurance program for all Americans and could cause wealthier and healthier people to leave the Medicare program."  [NCPSSM Questionnaire; CitizenAction Illinois Questionnaire, SEIU Questionnaire] MCCAIN ON MEDICARE ELIGIBILITY McCain voted to raise the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67. In 1997, McCain voted in favor of raising the eligibility age for receiving Medicarefrom 65 to 67 with the change being phased in between 2003 and 2027. The motion passed 62-38. [S 947, Vote #112, 6/24/97] OBAMA ON MENTAL HEALTH PARITY Obama is a long-time supporter of mental health parity legislation, having passed the Illinois Mental Health Parity Law.  He also co-sponsored theMental Health Parity Act of 2007.  Obama co-sponsored a bill to amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Public HealthService Act to require a group health plan that provides both medical and surgical benefits and mental health benefits to ensure that: (1) thefinancial requirements applicable to such mental health benefits are no more restrictive than those of substantially all medical and surgical benefitscovered by the plan, including deductibles and copayments; and (2) the treatment limitations applicable to such mental health benefits are no morerestrictive than those applied to substantially all medical and surgical benefits covered by the plan, including limits on the frequency oftreatments or similar limits on the scope or duration of treatment. The bill prohibited the plan from establishing separate cost sharing requirementsthat are applicable only with respect to mental health benefits. [110th,S.558, Introduced 2/12/07; HELP Report, 4/11/07] Obama co-sponsored and voted for a mental health parity bill that requires coverage for serious mental illnesses to be provided on the same terms andconditions as other illnesses and diseases.  [92nd GA; SB 1341; 2001; Signed into law 7/27/01, PA 92-0185] MCCAIN ON MENTAL HEALTH PARITY McCain's health care plan would eliminate the mental health parity requirements in 45 states.  [Wall Street Journal, 10/11/07; SOURCE: NationalConference of State Legislatures (http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/hmolaws.htm), accessed 7/30/07; Council for Affordable Health Insurance, accessed 7/30/07 (http://www.cahi.org/cahi_contents/resources/pdf/MandatePub2007.pdf)] OBAMA ON AUTISM Obama will increase federal funding for outreach and support services for people on the autism spectrum.  Specifically, "Obama will seek to increasefederal ASD funding for research, treatment, screenings, public awareness, and support services to $1 billion annually by the end of his first term inoffice.  Obama will also continue to work with parents, physicians, providers, researchers, and schools to create opportunities and effectivesolutions for people with ASD." [Obama Plan Supporting Americans with Autism Spectrum Disorders]Obama is a co-sponsor of the Expanding the Promise to Individuals with Autism Act (S.937) which would improve services and supports for individualswith autism spectrum disorder and their families.  It would build upon programs within the Developmental Disabilities Act to increaseinterdisciplinary training of professionals, development and dissemination of evidence-based autism treatments, interventions, supports and servicesfor children and adults, and protection and advocacy.  [S.937, 110th Congress] MCCAIN ON AUTISM McCain has not taken a leading role to expand services and supports for people with autism. McCain has not co-sponsored the Expanding the Promise toIndividuals with Autism Act (S.937). [S.937, 110th Congress] McCain says he will work to advance federal autism research.  "As President, John McCain will work to advance federal research into autism,promote early screening, and identify better treatment options, while providing support for children with autism so that they may reach their fullpotential." [McCain Statement on Combating Autism in America]  OBAMA ON VOTING RIGHTS FOR AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES Obama supports fully funding the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) so that we can ensure all polling places are accessible.   His administration wouldalso assure better enforcement of federal disability rights laws - from HAVA to the Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act to the ADA -to make sure the right of Americans with disabilities to vote is fully protected. [Obama Plan to Empower Individuals with Disabilities]  MCCAIN ON VOTING RIGHTS FOR AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES In 2002, McCain voted repeatedly against the Help America Vote Act, which was offered to correct problems in the election system and impose detailedvoting-procedure requirements on the states.  McCain voted for final passage of the bill.  [S.565, Senate Vote #39, 3/1/02; S.565, Senate Vote #Vote 40,3/4/02; H.R.3295, Senate Vote #238, 10/16/02]   OBAMA ON VETERANS WITH DISABILITIES The Disabled America Veterans (DAV) gave Obama an 80% rating in 2006. [Project Vote Smart]  MCCAIN ON VETERANS WITH DISABILITIES McCain voted with the Disabled American Veterans 20% of the time. Factcheck.org "However, he is correct in that McCain doesn't have a perfectscore with DAV (Disabled American Veterans), a group of 1.3 million disabled veterans that supports more funding for veterans health care. McCain has a20 percent record of voting the way DAV would like him to in 2006...Senators were evaluated on five votes for amendments that would have increasedfunding for veterans' health care." [Factcheck.org]

 

The Seventh Generation

By Sally Pla
Sunday, Nov 2 2008, 05:04 PM

Change is hard.

And we haven't undergone this much tumultuous change as a country since Vietnam. We can all recite the litany of woes: two difficult wars, a tarnished international reputation, global climate change, a tanked economy. an interconnected global reality where we must borrow from China to pay the Middle East, and a terrible polarization of Americans into supposedly extremist camps of conservative and liberal.

It's true that we've stirred up ideological wars at home to parallel the desperately real ones abroad. America is experiencing a conflict of conviction. We don't know what it is anymore that grounds our common values as a people. And it occurs to me, in trying to puzzle all this out, that we are torn apart in all the ways human nature typically responds to change. We strike out. We draw in. We propose radical new solutions. We retreat, fearful, and glorify the past.

What does it mean to be conservative? There is this impulse to conserve, preserve, retreat into symbols of the familiar. We yearn for tradition, the symbolic vision of the perfect 1950s America, white picket fences, good decent neighbors, traditional family values, church on Sunday, helping hands from the community when you need it, every person with the same chance to get ahead, where hard work and determination will get you somewhere (and its corollary: If you don't get ahead, it must be because you don't have enough determination and you're not working hard enough). 

America today is more and more unrecognizable from this ideal (some would argue it ALWAYS was unrecognizable from this ideal) so what do we do when confronted with threats to our world view? We try to recapture it. We stubbornly cling to it and reject the new (for example, there can't possibly be climate change. Climates don't change. What happened to the good old days when being an American MEANT something? )

Then, we intensify the rules: We replace our mainline churches with fundamentalist churches that more strictly address our yearning for solid values. Amid these larger groups of fellow worshippers, we feel part of something that is whole, that is decent, again. And images become even more important, because it is a human need to have images, symbols, to define what we stand for -- especially when we need convincing, ourselves. The flag, the crosses, the fish symbols, the yellow ribbons, all the signs and trappings of a good, decent, traditional, values-based America gain unwieldy importance and undeserved sacredness in our minds, because it has become a slippery, hazardous world out there, and we want to belong to the 'right group,' the group that stands for the 'right things,' -- Human nature.  

Then there are those of us who advance unblinking into the new, those of us who embrace change -- sometimes recklessly, sometimes too casually -- and who are inclined to discard symbols of the past, real or imagined, to embrace an untested new reality. Those of us whose readings of history and experience in the world shows us there have always been flaws, always been injustices, and one can only learn from them and move on -- put faith in a better future. We can have nostalgia for the era of  white picket fences, while simultaneously wanting to just pick up and move the picket fences into a future where they'll actually fit. We realize we must embrace change or it will turn on us and bite us in the behind. We must manage it, mold it into the kind of world our best ideals require -- a world with equal opportunity, abounding new technologies all used for human good, a global spirit of cooperation.

This process of "managing change" is a messy business, however. Things can get lost -- valuable things -- in the translation, and it's hard to say goodbye. But other things -- perhaps more valuable things --  are gained.

How do we manage change? There is no strict right and wrong. The two approaches can be held in the same brain, by the same person, as often -- almost always -- happens. That's human nature. But we have to remember that change cannot be stopped. We cannot go back to a black-and-white Mayberry world. Hey, even the Amish change, adapt new ways that complement/enhance their belief systems. Change is our only constant in life on earth, and we resist it at our peril. So we need to learn to manage it effectively.

We manage change intelligently when we realize that fear of the unknown is human nature -- and can be overcome. Power-hungry politicians will always exploit our fear of the unknown, and we must think-- use our brains -- to carefully analyze what they say. A politician with a desperate agenda will not always represent an accurate version of the future to us. What that politician WILL always do, is exploit our fear to their advantage. Fear is a powerful vote-getter. Fear impedes change.

We manage change and balance our traditionalist and futurist selves well, when we understand that there are better, more profound ways to measure a person's character, ability, and integrity than whether or not a flag pin happens to be on their lapel today or how much their designer wardrobe cost. Does their outside behavior match their internal agenda -- does their 'walk' match their talk? Does it really? Has it historically? Do some objective research.   

We manage change effectively when we choose to educate ourselves from the abundance of diverse news and information sources available to us in this world -- not just from one or two sources we are already predisposed to agree with.

If you get your 'news' from one or two familiar sources, you are not learning. You are receiving propaganda reinforcement.

We manage change well when we realize that our emotions will get in the way, and we need to account for that, and set our baser knee-jerk emotions of fear, ignorance, bigotry, to the side.  Cries of "impending Communism!" "Arab!" "Terrorist!" and the like? This is an infantile abuse of our emotions for political gain. A little bit of education, objective information, and this castle of fear crumbles to bits. The question is, do we have enough education and worldliness to realize this? Can we summon enough sophistication of thought to overcome the fearmongering?   

Most importantly, most incredibly importantly, we manage change well when we think not only of our own back yards, but of the big-picture: How will our decisions affect not only our generation, but out, as the Native American expression has it, to the Seventh Generation?  When we acknowledge that the health of the full nation, the greater good, our children's children's future -- when we realize this is a nobler goal than our own personal immediate tax break or gain -- we are being most truly American.

Wasn't that the most noble of our conservative traditional American values? The greater good?  

Let's try not to get tangled in the desperate, last-ditch namecalling and fearmongering. Let's do our own, dispassionate, informed research. Let's not allow ourselves to be emotionally manipulated by those desperate for power. And let's vote not just for our own personal gain, but for the future interests of the seventh generation. 

We are more or less seven generations removed from our founding fathers. What will our progeny think of us, when they reflect back 250 years from now?