Pastor Matt Trewhella will not vote for the McCain/Palin ticket. Why? Because Palin is on the ticket and as a Christian man "...will not vote to put a woman in the number two leadership spot," and that "women should not be in leadership when it comes to matters of public policy."

You see, if you vote for a woman you become apart of the "Christ-hating egalitarian agenda of the socialist elitists of this nation." Yes, that's correct conservatives - you are a Christ-Hating Elitist Socialist if you vote for McCain/Palin. 

Why? Well, it's not that the Pastor is a sexist, no - he assures us, its because he's a theist. His reasoning is Biblically sanctioned. For this reason, he feels that women should not be public leaders outside the home where God has deemed as the priority of a woman's concerns, and they should not have the right to vote as well.

The explanation?

The egalitarian agenda has been pushed in this nation for about 100 years now, and is historically rooted in socialism. The Suffrage movement, wherein women obtained the right to vote, was manufactured by socialists who - because of the Christian consensus in the country at that time - guardedly used Christian words (and dress) to move their God-hating agenda forward. You can go to countless pro-abortion and pro-homosexual (lesbian) websites today which boast of their roots being founded in the Suffrage movement.

Apparently, the cumulative result of allowing women to vote has denigrated a man's masculinity. Yep, if women vote, men are emasculated.

As the Pastor observes that "most people on the right have become socialists."

I so love this. Our dear Pastor has shifted the baseline.

Whereas your normal conservative will fear-bait a liberal by branding them as a "socialist," this Pastor now casts the very same stone against you garden-variety conservatives.

Yes, that's right - you conservatives are just as every bit socialist as you think we liberals are.

(Source)
 

While Barack Obama's former pastor was criticized by the right wing for condemning US domestic policy where the plight of African-Americans are concerned, we find that Republican VP pick, Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin shares many of the same views as a Christian Nationalist would. Any outrage from the right wing? Nope. She's just a drone in their army.

As a drone, Palin adheres herself to every right-wing belief in the denial of reality. Anti-science - creationism in the public schools. America the Christian Nation - the state should force you to worship one God and pay for it. As a "feminist" she is for freedom of choice - freedom of government to choose mandatory pregnancy for women. Even if that choice was made for them by a rapist. Anti-gay - of course.

Palin was vetted as the McCain campaign vigorously asserts, but vetted for her appeal to right wing Christians. Right-wing Christian Nationalists and social conservatives are suspicious of McCain for vacillating on abortion and for his past negative statements against Christian Nationalists and social conservatives like Farwell and Robertson. In order to curry the favor of this niche of the conservative movement, and of people like James Dobson, Palin must be a bridge for McCain's past criticism.

As with many people in the U.S. political values are predicated upon religious beliefs. We learn these beliefs as children, encouraged by our parents and reinforced by our religious leaders. Palin has been a lifelong member of Wasilla Assembly of God.

In a video all over YouTube, Palin explains the significance of Iraq at Wasilla. She states that America's service men and women are "out on a task that is from God." This task is according to a "plan and that plan is God's plan." This is from a candidate who could be Commander in Chief someday. In this regard, she is no different than President Bush who said that God told, "George go and end the tyranny in Iraq."

Senior Pastor Ed Kalnins of Palin's church in a somewhat recent sermon stated "What you see in Iraq, basically, is a manifestation of what's going on in this unseen world called the spirit world." Basically, the Pastor is drawing an analogy between the War in Iraq is like a war on Christianity - their brand, of course. And the best way to defend Christianity in the United States is to war in Iraq. Why? Kalninis needs you to understand that when he assures you "Jesus called us to die... He's called us to die."

Al Qaeda's war against the United States is a Holy War. When you die for Allah you are awarded in heaven. Iraq, for the United States, has become a Holy War. And they wonder why we call them these Christian nationalists the American Taliban?

One of the more lofty goals for a Christian in their daily struggle against sin, is that they are encouraged to follow Jesus in all things. Jesus is assured to us as the most perfect example of how one should live a moral life on this earth. Often, Christians are reminded of Mark 10:21 where Jesus admonishes his disciples to "..go and sell everything you own, give the money to the destitute, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come back and follow me."

According to Kalnins, following Jesus means  "... we can't even follow him unless you are willing to give up your life."

Apparently, the new route to heaven is through the treasured oil fields of Iraq.

 No, this is not a joke. Tom Willis explains what to do about the "evolution" problem in the United States. 

Thus, it is my theory that it will not, of course, be Christians who kill all the evolutionists, but Muslims who delight in killing both evolutionists and Christians.

Nevertheless, I find it instructive and entertaining to analyze what should be done with evolutionists before their end comes.

After a pretty ridiculous attempt to debunk evolution, Willis then goes on to lie on several accounts. Blaming the theory of evolution for every social ill in the past 50 years, while ignoring important facts that Hitler was a Christian. Anti-antisemitism existed for in Europe for centuries and was promulgated by the Catholic Church as late as 1914. He also conveniently omits that Christians looked to the Bible as a justification for slavery in the United States.

He poses the following question, therefore:

Clearly then, “evolutionists should not be allowed to roam free in the land."

Willis answers:

1. Labor camps. Their fellow believers were high on these. But, my position would be that most of them have lived their lives at, or near the public trough. So, after their own beliefs, their life should continue only as long as they can support themselves in the camps.
2. Require them to wear placards around their neck, or perhapsvlarge medallions which prominently announce "Warning: Evolutionist! Mentally Incompetent - Potentially Dangerous." I consider this option too dangerous.
3. Since evolutionists are liars and most do not really believe evolution we could employ truth serum or water-boarding to obtain confessions of evolution rejection. But, this should, at most, result in parole, because, like Muslims, evolutionist religion permits them to lie if there is any benefit to them.
4. An Evolutionist Colony in Antarctica could be a promising option. Of course inspections would be required to prevent too much progress. They might invent gunpowder.
5. A colony on Mars would prevent gunpowder from harming anyone but their own kind, in the unlikely event they turned out to be intelligent enough to invent it.
6. All options should include 24-hour sound system playing Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris reading Darwin's Origin of Species, or the preservation of Favored Races by Means of Natural Selection. Of course some will consider this cruel & unusual, especially since they will undoubtedly have that treatment for eternity.

No this is not Poe's Law in action. Willis does not see the irony of his "speculation." Nazi's used camps and badges. Communists put evolutionists into camps in subservience of their political religion. There really is so many things to ridicule in this pile of..., I don't think there really is enough bandwidth to go into it all.

It's not evolution Willis gives a damn about, but Biblical literalism.  A man like this would become his worst enemy and burn the earth to cinders in defense of a worldview which is grounded in iron age ignorance and bronze age brutality.

Technorati Profile

Really?

This is the God countless Americans pray to each day?

A God that would withhold his protection to allow Muslim terrorists to attack property and destroy lives?

Is this how God blesses America?

And for what? For immigration? For peace? Because of what land?

Seriously, God is irked over land?

And this is the God I am supposed to worship and obey?